WebRCr 9.22 Objections, exceptions unnecessary. Currentness. Formal exceptions to rulings or orders of the court are unnecessary; but for all purposes for which an exception has heretofore been necessary it is sufficient that a party, at the time the ruling or order of the court is made or sought, makes known to the court the action which that ... WebRCr 11.42 “RCr 11.42 provides a procedure for a motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence for ‘a prisoner in custody under sentence or a defendant on probation, parole or conditional discharge.’ It provides a vehicle to attack an erroneous judgment for reasons which are not accessible by direct appeal.” Gross v.
Renfro v. Com., 893 S.W.2d 795 – CourtListener.com
WebJan 22, 2009 · RCr 9.36(1). “A determination as to whether to exclude a juror for cause lies within the sound discretion of the trial court, and unless the action of the trial court is an abuse of discretion or is clearly erroneous, an appellate court will not reverse the trial court's determination.” Pendleton v. Commonwealth, 83 S.W.3d 522, 527 (Ky.2002). WebFeb 13, 1992 · Commonwealth, Ky., 601 S.W.2d 280 (1980); RCr 9.22. The store owner's testimony was not hearsay because he testified about his specific conduct in observing … hikvision power over coax
RENFRO v. COM 893 S.W.2d 795 Ky. Judgment Law CaseMine
WebNovember 2000 - Department of Public Advocacy WebJan 31, 2007 · 4 See RCr 9.22. - 6 - For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the judgment of the Breathitt Circuit Court. ALL CONCUR. BRIEF FOR APPELLANT: Barbara Anderson Lexington, Kentucky BRIEF FOR APPELLEE: Gregory D. Stumbo Attorney General Clint E. Watson Assistant Attorney General Frankfort, Kentucky . Title: 2004-CA-002200 ... WebGet free access to the complete judgment in RUSSELL v. COMMONWEALTH on CaseMine. small wooden box joinery